Why the pre trib rapture is false

Added: Bailie Labriola - Date: 07.12.2021 19:40 - Views: 13918 - Clicks: 3291

The central purpose of this article is not to unveil the chief deficiencies of opposing stances, but to describe the superiority of pretribulationism as taught in major eschatological texts such as Matthew 24—25; 1 Thessalonians 4; 1 Corinthians 15; and Revelation 3, 6— It is not the weight of a single reason that makes pretribulationism so compelling, but instead the combined force of all the lines of reasoning.

There is a third use, which focuses on being caught up to heaven.

First Thessalonians —17 unquestionably refers to a rapture that is eschatological in nature. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first.

Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and thus we shall always be with the Lord. NASB, italics mine. Thus, it can be concluded that Scripture points to an eschatological rapture, even though neither of these foundational texts contains a time indicator. This theory rests on NT passages that stress obedient watching and waiting e. If this interpretation is correct, the result would be that only part of the church would be raptured, and those who are not raptured would endure a portion of or the entire seventieth week of Daniel.

However, these biblical texts which supposedly teach a partial rapture are better understood as differentiating between true believers who are raptured and merely professing, yet false believers who remain behind. There are numerous reasons the partial rapture theory fails to be convincing. Second, a partial rapture would logically demand a parallel partial resurrection, which is nowhere taught in Scripture.

Fourth, it creates a purgatory of sorts on earth for those believers left behind. Fifth, a partial rapture is nowhere explicitly taught in Scripture. Therefore, it is best concluded that the rapture Why the pre trib rapture is false be full and complete, not just partial. The following seven evidences point to a pretribulational rapture. AD It is unexpected that John would shift from detailed instructions for the church to complete silence about the church in the subsequent 13 chapters if, in fact, the church did continue into the tribulation.

Further, because Revelation 12 is a mini-synopsis of the entire tribulation period and because the woman who gave birth to the male child Rev. How could this be? First, if God miraculously preserves the church through the tribulation, why have a rapture? If it is to avoid the wrath of God at Armageddon, then Why the pre trib rapture is false would God not continue to protect the saints on earth as is postulated by posttribulationism just as He protected Israel see Exod.

Further, if the purpose of the rapture is for living saints to avoid Armageddon, why also resurrect the saints who are already immune at the same time? Separation will have taken place in the very act of translation.

Third, if all tribulation believers are raptured and glorified just prior to the inauguration of the millennial Kingdom, who then will populate and propagate the Kingdom? The Scriptures indicate that the living unbelievers will be judged at the end of the tribulation and removed from the earth see Matt. Yet, they also teach that children will be born to believers during the millennium and that these children will be capable of sin see Isa. This will not be possible if all believers on earth have been glorified through a posttribulational rapture.

Fourth, the posttribulational paradigm of the church being raptured and then immediately brought back to earth leaves no time for the Bema, i. Thus, it can be concluded that a posttribulational time of the rapture is incongruous with the sheep-goat nation judgment, and, in fact, eliminates two critical end-time events.

A pretribulational rapture avoids all of these difficulties. They warn vigorously about coming error and false prophets see Acts —30; 2 Pet. They warn against ungodly living see Eph. They even admonish believers to endure in the midst of present tribulation see 1 Thess. However, there is absolute silence on preparing the church for any kind of tribulation like that found in Revelation 6— It is incongruous, then, that the Scriptures would be silent about such a traumatic change for the church.

If any time of the rapture other than pretribulational were true, one would expect the epistles to teach the reality of the church in the tribulation, the purpose of the church in the tribulation, and the conduct of the church in the tribulation.

However, there is no teaching whatsoever. Only a pretribulational rapture satisfactorily explains this silence. Suppose, hypothetically, that some other rapture timing besides pretribulational is true. What would one expect to find in 1 Thessalonians 4?

How does this compare with what is actually observed? First, one would expect the Thessalonians to be joyous over the fact that loved ones are home with the Lord and will not have to endure the horrors of the tribulation. But the Thessalonians are actually grieving because they fear their loved ones have missed the rapture. Only a pretribulational rapture s for this grief.

Second, one would expect the Thessalonians to be grieving over their own impending trial rather than grieving over loved ones. Furthermore, they would be inquisitive about their own future doom. But the Thessalonians have no fears or questions about the coming tribulation. Third, one would expect Paul, even in the absence of interest or questions by the Thessalonians, to have provided instructions and exhortation for such a supreme test, which would make their present tribulation seem microscopic in comparison.

But not one indication of any impending tribulation of this sort appears in the text. First Thessalonians 4 fits only the model of a pretribulational rapture. It is incompatible with any other time for the rapture. Study Eschatology in the Master of Divinity Program. It is not a promise to all believers that they shall go to Him at death. It does refer to the rapture of the church. Note the close parallel between the promises of John —3 and 1 Thessalonians — He promised that He would return and receive them so that they could be with Him wherever Why the pre trib rapture is false was.

A posttribulational rapture demands that the saints meet Christ in the air and immediately descend to earth without experiencing what the Lord promised in John Finally, the rapture is not mentioned in either of the most detailed second coming texts—Matthew 24 and Revelation This is to be expected in light of the observations above, because the pretribulational rapture will have occurred seven years earlier.

The Greek preposition ek has the idea of emergence, but this is not the case in every context. Two notable exceptions to the basic idea are 2 Corinthians and 1 Thessalonians In the Corinthian passage, Paul rehearses his rescue from death by God. As is apparent, Paul did not emerge from a state of death, but instead was rescued from that potential danger. Even more convincing is 1 Thessalonians Here Paul states that Jesus is rescuing believers out of the wrath to come.

The idea is not emergence out of wrath, but rather protection from entrance into wrath. At best, all positions remain possible. James The greater burden of proof lies with the mid- and post- tribulational positions since their solution of immunity within does not explain the use of ek.

First, ek is much closer to apo in meaning than it is to eneisor dia. The two frequently overlap, and Why the pre trib rapture is false modern Greek apo is absorbing ek.

When combined with tereoek much more closely approximates apo than it does eneis or dia. Second, the phrase tereo en is used three times in the NT see Acts ; 1 Pet. In each instance, it implies existence within with a view to continuation within. Now, if tereo en means continued existence within, what does tereo ek mean? Since they are anything but synonymous, it quite logically means to maintain an existence outside.

John is the only other passage in the NT where tereo ek occurs. This word combination does not occur in the Septuagint. It is assumed that whatever the phrase means here, it also means the same in Revelation Now if 1 John implies that believers are not in the power of the evil one, John could not possibly imply that they are in the power of Satan and needing protection.

Since Why the pre trib rapture is false means to keep outside of the evil one, the parallel thought in Revelation is to keep the church outside of the hour of testing. Therefore, only a pretribulational rapture would fulfill the promise. If Revelation means immunity or protection within as other positions insist, several contradictions result.

Second, if it is argued that Revelation means total immunity, then of what worth is the promise in light of Revelation —11 and where martyrs abound? So the use of this particular word is not at all decisive. Second, remember that Christ is coming to a hostile people in general who will eventually fight against him at Armageddon.

So, the pretribulational rapture best pictures the king rescuing, by rapture, His faithful followers who are trapped in a hostile world and who will later accompany Him when He returns to conquer His enemies and set up His Kingdom cf. Paul exhorts believers in 1 Thessalonians to be alert and living godly in a Day of the Lord context just as Peter does in 2 Peter —15 where the Day of the Lord experience is clearly at the end of the millennium when the old heavens and earth will be destroyed and replaced with the new. These texts are not determining factors for any positions on the time of the rapture.

In fact, Matthew —42 teaches just the opposite.

Why the pre trib rapture is false

email: [email protected] - phone:(953) 417-2579 x 8303

Why a Pretribulational Rapture?